College comparison

Clinton Essex Warren Washington BOCES vs New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology

A side-by-side of acceptance rate, test scores, and cost — source-cited estimates, not guarantees. Want the number that actually matters for your student? Model your admit odds at each.

Metric	Clinton Essex Warren Washington BOCES Plattsburgh, NY	New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Socorro, NM
Acceptance rateClinton Essex Warren Washington BOCES is more selective	31%	44%
SAT (25–75)	—	1080–1310
ACT (25–75)	—	—
Undergrad enrollment	31	995
Avg net price	$14,384	$9,873
Test policy	—	—
Type	Public	Public
Location	Plattsburgh, NY	Socorro, NM

Quick answers

Is Clinton Essex Warren Washington BOCES or New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology harder to get into?

Clinton Essex Warren Washington BOCES is more selective: Clinton Essex Warren Washington BOCES's acceptance rate is approximately 31% and New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology's is approximately 44% (estimates from public and primary sources).

What SAT score do you need for Clinton Essex Warren Washington BOCES vs New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology?

The middle-50% SAT range is — at Clinton Essex Warren Washington BOCES and 1080–1310 at New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology. Scores outside these bands are still admitted, especially with strong applications.

Figures are estimates compiled from public datasets (College Scorecard / IPEDS) and primary sources; verify with each institution before relying on them.

These outputs are estimates from a baseline model — not guarantees of admission, cost, or outcome.